Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
I need some interpretation help (or is there a FAQ on this somewhere?This is the spells description:Quote:Magic Weapon, GreaterTransmutationLevel: Clr 4, Pal 3, Sor/Wiz 3 Components: V, S, M/DF...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
It's legit. Nothing illegal there.Black knee-length dress: $54.00. Push-up bra: $34.00. Thong underwear: $12.00. All your girlfriend's clothes on my floor: Priceless.
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
blacktom... well except that at 12th level his weapon would only be a +3remember, like bonuses do not stack!To the gods, this is all a game...A simple roll of the dice...Their dice is our free...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Quote:Is it legit or have I missed something in the rules? Uh, Blacktom... you have missed something (though not much). A 12th level caster would only get a +3 enhancement bonus with Greater Magic...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Thanks guys, but I forgot to mention that I am playing 3.0. I think I will make the switch whenever I feel that I master the 3.0 rules. Don't feel up to a new system yet. I do understand why they...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Blacktom,Let him enjoy his +3 Holy Demonsbane Morningstar and just do the opposite of the scenario above.Have your BBEGs cast Greater Magic Weapon on arrows and pepper him until he gets within melee...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
I only play 3.0 as well. The only difference in this spell between 3.0 & 3.5 is that 3.5 allows it to be cast on a monk's unarmed strikes."The ebb and flow of the Atlantic tides, the drift of the...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Are you sure it's not also the number of pluses per level that's changed, KotC? I think it changed from +1 per 3 levels in 3.0 to +1 per 4 levels in 3.5.
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Yup. You only get +1 per 4 levels instead of +1 per 3 levels.JamesI like FR and am not afraid to admit it.
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
You are correct Arnwyn. Thanks I had missed that. Just proves even more that I don't play 3.5. I don't think that is the issue that was originally posted (unless I am mistaken). I got the feeling that...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Quote:I don't think that is the issue that was originally posted (unless I am mistaken). I got the feeling that it was the fact that the players were spreading out the arrows more than the actual +3...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Hey BlackTom, the Greater Magic Weapon on the mace will also be subject to your enemy spellcaster's Greater Dispel Magic.
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Quote:Hey BlackTom, the Greater Magic Weapon on the mace will also be subject to your enemy spellcaster's Greater Dispel Magic. Grimbold, this means that your players are also susceptable to it one...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
No. Also, I think you have to cast the Greater Dispel on the arrows, not the person. The Greater Magic Weapon isn't on the person. So if you target the person, you get the effects on the person. I...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
If you had cast the spell in a way that affected one archer's arrows then there could be an argument that all of the arrows from the group created by the spell are dispelled. It is just one spell that...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
That line of reasoning is good. That is why they have to be touching when enchated, so they can be connected by the spell. Yeah, the silver cord approach can definitely be used for any area effect...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
That logic sounds reasonable, but it would then follow that your enemy's slow spell (which caught only one party member) would dispel the haste that was affecting the entire party, even though they...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
I would never let a single dispel on one arrow affect the rest of the arrows if they were not all together.JamesI like FR and am not afraid to admit it.
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
Yeah, you would definitely have to have something specified as far as area of effect or have it clearly spelled out to your players why one particular spell is affected by a dispel that way and not...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
When dispelling magic arrows, You are not dispelling 50 different spells, you are only dispelling 1 spell.You'd have to ask the following:If only part of a creature or object falls within the area of...
View ArticleRe: Magic Weapon, Greater - dispute
What you are not taking into account is the distance that separates the arrows. If they were all together like they were during the casting, I would say yes, they could be dispelled with one spell....
View Article
